Mercer County
August 23, 2018 6:00 PM
Special Board Meeting
1. Call to Order/Roll Call
Marianne Davis
Rationale

Marianne Davis, District 1

Larry Yeager, District 2

Billy Montgomery, District 3

Christie Devine, District 4

Randy Phillips, District 5

2. Approval of Agenda
Marianne Davis
Rationale

The agenda is being presented for approval. Any changes are to be made at this time.

3. Board Member Comment
Marianne Davis
Rationale

Any board member wishing to comment may do so at this time.

 

4. Public Participation
Marianne Davis
Rationale

Pursuant to Board Policy 01.421, persons wishing to address the Board must first be recognized by the Chairperson and stand behind the podium. An individual or group granted the privilege of being heard must give his/her name, address, and reason for speaking. The Chairperson may rule on the relevance of the topic to the Board's Agenda, and will set the time limit to five (5) minutes. The Board will only act on/respond to items on the published agenda. If you wish to have an item placed on the agenda, you must first meet with the Superintendent.

 

At this time the board will receive comments from the public.

5. August Leave of Absences (Medical and Personal)
Dennis Davis
Rationale

SUBJECT: (AUGUST)  LEAVE OF ABSENCE REQUESTS
 
Medical Leaves


1.  A bus monitor, Danna Yates, is requesting unpaid medical leave due to an injury. This will require her to be off work until January 1, 2019. She plans to use a combination of sick, personal, and unpaid days.


2.  A bus driver, William (Condit) Baker, is requesting unpaid medical leave due to surgery beginning August 3, through November 1, 2018. He will be using mostly unpaid days and a few  sick days.


Personal Unpaid Leaves


3.  A teacher, Ellie Vandivier, is requesting unpaid personal leave beginning October 15 through     
 October 23, 2018. She will using all unpaid days except for two personal days.


4. An instructional assistant, Emily Vandivier, is requesting unpaid personal leave beginning  
 October 15 through October 26, 2018. She will be using all unpaid days except for two personal
     days.


5. A teacher, Brian Rowland, is requesting unpaid personal leave September 18 through September 28. He plans to use five unpaid days, two personal
  and two sick days.

6. Tax Rates 2018-19
Dennis Davis/Amber Minor
Rationale

Tax Rates 2018-19

             

It is the local school boards responsibility to set tax rates for the year. These tax rates must be levied 45 calendar days from the date that the state certified the assessment for the district. The state certified the Mercer County School’s tax assessment on July 31, 2018. This means that taxes must be levied by September 14, 2018. If the board wishes to vote on either the Subsection (1) Rate or the 4% Increase Rate, there must be a hearing before the tax rates can be levied. The requirements for the tax hearing is that it must be published at least twice for two (2) consecutive weeks, in the newspaper of largest circulation in the county, and the hearing must be within 7-10 calendar days from the last published ad. Our tax rate ad was published in the Harrodsburg Herald on August 9, 2018 and August 16, 2018, which means the hearing must be between August 23, 2018 – August 26, 2018. The hearing is scheduled for Thursday, August 23, 2018 at 5:30 p.m. to be immediately followed by a special board meeting to set the tax rate.

 

What are our choices?

Under House Bill 44, there are three choices according to KDE:

  • Compensating Rate 66.6* (both real estate and personal property) – generates same amount of revenue as prior year; $8,152,586 in revenue
  • Subsection (1) Rate 67.1* (both real estate and personal property) – hearing required; not subject to recall in this case; $8,213,883 in revenue
  • 4% Increase Rate 69.2* (both real estate and personal property) – generates revenue that is 4% greater than prior year; hearing required; no recall; $8,471,333 in revenue

 

What is the Superintendent’s recommendation?

The Superintendent recommends levying the 4% Increase Rate of 69.2* for both real estate and personal property. Motor vehicle rates would remain the same at 49.1 cents per $100, which is the maximum rate.

 

What does this mean for the tax payer?

4% Increase Tax Rate (which means revenue is 4% more than prior year) – increases rate from 66.5 cents per $100 in 2017-18 to 69.2* cents in 2018-19, an increase of 2.7 cents or $27 for a $100,000 property owner; $54 for a $200,000 property owner; and $81 for a $300,000 property owner.

 

What does this mean for the school district?

Proposed tax rates of 69.2* cents per $100 for real estate and personal property constitutes a 2.7 cent increase from the prior year’s rate (66.5) and would generate approximately $300,000 more in revenue for the general fund as opposed to the compensating rate.

 

Of the 69.2* cents, 16.8 cents is legally required to be used for building/construction purposes only (that is the first, second, and third nickel taxes).  This would mean 52.4 cents is for operations/instruction.

 

 

2018-19

Tax Rate

Change

+/- on $100,00 home for year

Building Fund Tax Rate (Nickel Taxes)

Left to use on Instruction/

Operations

Compensating

66.6*

.1

$1.00

16.8

49.8

Subsection (1)

67.1*

.6

$6.00

16.8

50.3

4% Increase

69.2*

2.7

$27.00

16.8

52.4

 

Revenue Projections

 

 

Tax Rate

Total

Possible

Revenue

Actual Revenue

Collection Percentage

General Fund Revenue

2017-18

66.5

$7,343,934

$7,068,413

96.3%

$5,021,954

 

 

2018-19

Tax Rate

Total

Projected Revenue

Collection Percentage

Adjusted Projected Revenue

Sheriff’s Office Commission

Adjusted General Fund Projected Revenue

Compensating

66.6*

$8,152,586

96.3%

$7,850,940

$176,646

$4,915,313

Subsection (1)

67.1*

$8,213,883

96.3%

$7,909,969

$177,974

$4,973,014

4% Increase

69.2*

$8,471,333

96.3%

$8,157,894

$183,553

$5,215,360

 

Projected General Fund Revenue Difference from fiscal year 2018:

  • Compensating = ($106,641)
  • Subsection (1) = ($48,940)
  • 4% Increase = $193,406

 

 

Comparing Projected Revenue

Compensating vs.

4% Increase

Difference this year

$300,047

Difference in 5 years

$1,500,235

Difference in 10 years

$3,000,470

Difference in 20 years

$6,000,940

What are the plans for the revenue?

  • Compensating – The projection shows a decrease in general fund revenue of $106,641 compared to last year. Due to that, there would be no way to increase section 6 funding, it would need to remain at the $100/pupil amount. Nothing new added to the budget. Would need to look at another drastic cut somewhere.
  • Subsection (1) – The projection also shows a decrease in general fund revenue in the amount of $48,940 compared to last year. The same as the compensating rate, there would be no way to increase section 6 funding. Nothing new added to the budget. Would need to look at a cut somewhere in the general fund budget.
  • 4% Increase – The projection shows an increase in general fund revenue of $193,406 compared to last year. Due to that, we would be able to restore section 6 funding to $139.33/pupil, which amounts to approximately $101,250. Addressing supply lists and students fees with the remaining increased revenue of $92,156.

 

How does our district compare to surrounding districts in 2017-18?

 

District

Real Estate/ Tangible Rates

District

Real Estate/ Tangible Rates

Anderson

62.7 (4%) (73)

Garrard

67.5 (4%) (55)

Bardstown

81.4 (4%) (29)

Jessamine

69.3 (4%) (48)

Boyle

70.4 (Other) (46)

Mercer

66.5 (4%) (59)

Burgin

69.5 (4%) (47)

Nelson

76.4 (4%) (35)

Danville

94.5 (Comp) (12)

Washington

60.2 (Comp) (80)

The numbers in parenthesis show the rank on tax rate amounts with 1 being the highest and 147 being the lowest tax rate for 2017-18.

 

In 2017-18 there were 59 higher tax rates than Mercer County and 88 lower tax rates than Mercer County. Out of 173 districts 80 levied the 4% tax rate, 53 levied the Compensating rate, 36 levied the Other rate, 2 levied the Sub [1] rate, and 2 levied the House Bill 940 rate.

 

What is Mercer County’s tax rate history?

Over the last 6 years, tax rate increased only 3.9 cents per $100:

 

Year

Approved Tax Rate

4% Rate for the Year

Difference in Approved and 4%

Lost Revenue as of 2018-19

2012-13

62.6 (4%)

62.6

0

0

2013-14

62.6 (Other)

64

1.4[MA-M1]

$656,580

2014-15

64.8 (4%)

64.8

0

0

2015-16

64.9 (Other)

66.5

1.6

$663,260

2016-17

64.9 (Other)

67

2.1

$652,440

2017-18

66.5 (4%)

66.5

0

0

 

In the last six years, we have lost a total of $1,972,280 in revenue by not increasing taxes every year. That will compound to right under $2.5 million for next fiscal year ($492,725/year).

What is the impact on the budget?

 

 

Compensating

Subsection (1)

4% Increase

Working Budget Ending Balance FY 19

$1,853,542

$1,911,243

$2,153,589

Working Budget Contingency FY 19

7.69%

7.93%

8.94%

Difference in FY 19 Beginning Balance & FY 20 Beginning Balance

($1.65 million)

($1.59 million)

($1.35 million)

Estimated Ending Balance FY 20

$207,084

$322,486

$807,178

Estimated Contingency FY 20

.86%

1.34%

3.35%

*0.1 cents may be added to the property rates to recover prior year losses due to exonerations. These rates reflect the 0.1 cents.

7. Section 6 Allocations
Dennis Davis/Amber Minor
Rationale

Finalize Section 6 Allocations. The board voted In May to decrease Section 6 Allocations to $100/pupil until we knew more about funding for fiscal year 2019. If the taxes are increased it is recommended to restore those funds back to $139.33/pupil which amounts to approximately $101,250. We will be adjusting the allocations in regards to attendance the beginning of September and those numbers will be provided to the board at the September meeting.

8. Adjournment
Marianne Davis